<> Not Equal To != ?

Comments

• HARMAN_guy.minervini AMX Commercial Support

  May 2013

  Adjunct Committee to Stamp Out and Abolish Redundancy
  

  rynando wrote: »

  Ya but for me the readability is improved by having the != in there.

  
  It is more readable, but it runs just a hair slower...but that's not a big deal unless you run it 50,000 times in FOR loop.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• AMXJeff Senior Member

  May 2013

  Hi Guy!!!!!

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Pep_SD Junior Member

  June 2013

  I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
  it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.
  
  It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case...

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• DHawthorne Junior Member

  June 2013

  Pep_SD wrote: »

  I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
  it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.
  
  It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case...

  
  I had the same experience, and the same lack of memory what the circumstances were. It could even have been fixed, for all I know, but the habit of using <> has become engrained.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• a_riot42 AMX Wizard

  June 2013

  I think finding that bug drove me temporarily insane and I simply dumped the entire memory of it from my brain.
  Paul

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• mpullin Obvious Troll Account, Marked for Deletion

  June 2013

  When I look at <>, it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• C.Houliaras Junior Member

  June 2013

  mpullin wrote: »

  When I look at , it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.

  
  I like how >< looks...

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter