<> Not Equal To != ?
Comments
-
Adjunct Committee to Stamp Out and Abolish RedundancyYa but for me the readability is improved by having the != in there.
It is more readable, but it runs just a hair slower...but that's not a big deal unless you run it 50,000 times in FOR loop. -
Hi Guy!!!!!
-
I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.
It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case... -
I too got burnt once using != intead of <>.
it was so painfull that I completely stopped using != for 'not equal to'.
It was when I started AMX a few years back and can't remember the case...
I had the same experience, and the same lack of memory what the circumstances were. It could even have been fixed, for all I know, but the habit of using <> has become engrained. -
I think finding that bug drove me temporarily insane and I simply dumped the entire memory of it from my brain.
Paul -
When I look at <>, it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.
-
When I look at , it bothers me... I get a feeling that something is missing.
I like how >< looks...
Categories
- All Categories
- 2.5K AMX General Discussion
- 922 AMX Technical Discussion
- 514 AMX Hardware
- 502 AMX Control Products
- 3 AMX Video Distribution Products
- 9 AMX Networked AV (SVSI) Products
- AMX Workspace & Collaboration Products
- 3.4K AMX Software
- 151 AMX Resource Management Suite Software
- 386 AMX Design Tools
- 2.4K NetLinx Studio
- 135 Duet/Cafe Duet
- 248 NetLinx Modules & Duet Modules
- 57 AMX RPM Forum
- 228 MODPEDIA - The Public Repository of Modules for Everyone
- 943 AMX Specialty Forums
- 2.6K AMXForums Archive
- 2.6K AMXForums Archive Threads
- 1.5K AMX Hardware
- 432 AMX Applications and Solutions
- 249 Residential Forum
- 182 Tips and Tricks
- 146 AMX Website/Forums