Home DigiTech Forum GNX Forum Achive GNX4 General GNX4 General Discussion

Confessions of a GNX4 Owner...

Okay, I need to write to this forum because I own a GNX4 for a several months. Here's what I'm thinking. -Oh, before I get started, my setup is simple: G&L ASAT Classic, GNX4, 60w Roland Cube amp. I'm gigging 2-3 times a week and I also teach guitar. Anyway, here are my feelings since buying a GNX4.

I'm very frustrated. -Actually I'm sorta beyond frustrated to the point where I'm not getting anything out of my practices. I end up spending most of my time figuring out why the guitar sound is so damp and I hear a loud buzz when I take my fingers off the strings. -Yeah, I know it's something to do with grounding but I don't even want to deal with it. What will it be next?

As far as my band goes, I setup a kickass preset for doing \"Rocky Mountain Way.\" -But that's it. I'm scared to use it throughout our sets because I don't know how to set all the preset levels correctly. I mean, it seems there are a million ways to do this and then I read the sticky article here. That seems like too much of a hassle. I thought the design of this workstation was to make our lives easier? And how exactly does Volume Pedal Update work? Isn't that supposed to help with the leveling? Instead, I have to sit down like a tech (who knows what they're doing) and figure this stuff out. The funny thing is: I read the manuals, I've been familiar with Digitech pedals for years, but I have the slightest clue.

HA! Since I bought my GNX4, it has made me sweat more than a cracklin' PA system and an unpredictable drummer combined.

Anyway, I don't feel like I screwed the pooch on this one.-Yet. For some reason, I have faith in Digitech and I'm sure it won't be the last piece of expensive guitar equipment I'll ever buy. For the last 3 1/2 months, I have been slowly introducing the GNX4 into my setup and the dang thing in shaking my confidence.

Nate

Comments

  • Man don't give up on it!! I've had mine over a year I still learn new things, I get better at finding my live tones & setups. I've been an MFX Supermodel user from go first thing I bought. This realy helped me alot!! So much to choose from & different patches from clean to crunch to high gain lead tone of most models on this disc. That helped me immensly a True God send cause I'm not a tweaker!! So if you have not tried or used the MFX Supermodels try them out!! Test Drive some G3456 patches from the Patch library if you realy like them I would invest in the MFX Supermodel Disc!! The Exp pedal is used for a whole lot more than Volume pedal!! Not for leveling patches just go thru your patches in X edit & decreace or boost Levels or overall preset level gain whatever until you get consistent volume level from ch to ch & Patch to patch?? That is not hard to do you have ears on your head (sorry about that) But I mean you don't have to be a tech & have a power meter or something to level you patches to one another?? Anyhow I'm sorry your feeling like that you may as well want to check out some tutorials & Vids on this thing Don't get frustrated Keep on keepen on it's whorth it when you begin to get a handle on your tone & usage applications of this powerful, powerful piece of gear :wink: Here is the Link to the Supermodels & vid tutorials I know that will help if you let it!!

    http://www.mfxsupermodels.com/
  • I'm with Partch, and likely the rest of the guys here..while the GNX is indeed a very comlex peice o' gear, its' capacities to do thigns are so vast that it's really worth the effort.
    I s'pose it's not for everyone - players who don't like to tweek. Players wo don't like to read instructions or learn how-to's. BUT...once you learn your way around this thing, it will never stop amazing you how capable and flexible it is. Personally, I haven't even picked up the manual in six months; and I only refer to it to figure out how to do something I haven't figured out on my own yet.
    If I may: the FIRST thing you have to read the manual cover to cover, or better yet, while you sit with git'r in hand and try the things you read. It's easier to become familiar with the unit than it appears.
    Next, you have to sorta open your mind as to what a floor/multi-effects unit does. The GNX is amazingly flexible, once you've wrapped your mind around what it can do. Don't be afraid to experiment and use your imagination.
    Also, the SuperModels and Anderton's book and tuturials aren't bad aids either. I consider them both excellent starting points. And Anderton has tutorials online, which are pretty helpful.
  • Maybe my amp isn't compatible with the GNX4. Anyone know any tricks, or a better amp to try out? My guitar is a G&L ASAT Classic.
  • I like you thought I hated the GNX4 , it took me forever to concede to the fact that you have to think differently for live sound to be acheived with it...to me anyway... I use Eminence Modeling 12 speakers that there helps coloration issues.... it's also great if you plug it straight into the PA.
    It takes awhile to set it up but once you do this thing truly gets reasonably great tones for any amp you emulate.... just keep messin with it....It's an invaluable tool
  • I like you thought I hated the GNX4 , it took me forever to concede to the fact that you have to think differently for live sound to be acheived with it...to me anyway... I use Eminence Modeling 12 speakers that there helps coloration issues.... it's also great if you plug it straight into the PA.
    It takes awhile to set it up but once you do this thing truly gets reasonably great tones for any amp you emulate.... just keep messin with it....It's an invaluable tool
    Yeah, same here. I first used GNX3 and just wasn't happy with it. I knew it was the kind of pedalboard I wanted, but somehow I wasn't satisfied with the sound. I tried GT-8 and XTL... same thing. Then I decided to rethink my strategy. Also, using it for direct recording helped put things in perspective. Getting a PA-type rig really sealed the deal. Then I got GNX4. Then GNX3000. Now, there's really no turning back for me.
  • I love my GNX4 and would not be without it. Having said that, I would not recommend it to anybody that either did not have the time, or the desire, to read the owner's manual. When I first got my GNX4, I just wanted to use the unit to make some decent sounds and simple recordings. I did not read the manual and quickly became frustrated because there are just so many options available. I finally got smart and got Anderton's \"Power User's Guide\" and went through it almost from cover to cover. Anderton takes the mystery out of this machine and gets you to actually using it. The owners manual is a great reference, but Anderton's tutorials on using the GNX4 made all the difference in the world for me. With the GNX4, I truely believe that you get out of it what you (unfortunately have to) put into it. But like others have stated, once you overcome the learning curve, you really appreciate what a great piece of gear this is.
  • Well said gtaus! There's lots of power there and the capabilities go deep. Unfortunately, this means that one has to really dig in to see how far one can go with the GNX processors. If someone doesn't want to do that then imho they'd be better off with stompboxes. Although I would have spent a lot more on stompboxes than I did on my GNX4 to get the same functionality. To each his own...

    Scott
  • Guys-

    Live, there is no better way than using the GNX4's output functions. The XLR's compensated to the PA. Now, send a 1/4\" line to the amp and mic the amp to the PA. Blend the mix at the PA FOH.

    Here you get a mono ch for the traditional sound and a nice blend with added stereo efx for the house mix from the XLR's. Set the mixer channels as needed for what YOU think works better.. more of XLR, less of the mic'd amp, or however you prefer.

    I have been doing this for all mutieffect users in bands when I run sound. From GNX4's to GT-8 PRO's The mix is one the most intelligible methods thus far. Remember the GNX4 outputs are independent (levels XLR and 1/4\") and each are compensation selectable.

    It does take 3 ch's of the board, but you can always use a small submixer and send that to a console only requiring 2chs. The blend is what is important. With the XLR channel mix lower than the amplifier mic'd channel
    the delivery is very wide and the mic'd center panned channel still dominates the mix.

    It's like this:

    Set your patch to work with the amp. that being gains modified etc. Now use that mic'd amp sound center panned.
    use the XLR's compensated to the board panned in opposition. one on L and one on R. The XLR blend will want to dominate the mix so trim it and keep the faders set so the mix is just above subtle. Slightly below the amp sound. This gives the efx stereo dimension and provides the raw sound from the amp to provide the traditional sound from a speaker cab.

    This works well and is completely controllable for any sound guy. They can also send you a monitor mix of all 3 so you hear the mono blend.
  • I tried the GNX4 with Fender,Peavy,Carvin guitar amps..with and without speaker comp and thru effects loops. I never got a good sound untill I started using full range and flat response speakers...IE PA or Keybord amp.
    Now my sound is great and people always comment on how cool my sound is.
    I even used an electronic drum amp with great success.
    It is true as well that it takes time to learn the GNX4.

    I decided to start simple with just a few good sounds..mostly tweaking the amp types or factory presets. I got a good Fender Twin and Marshall stack and slowly went from their.
    I also learned the onboard recorder before hooking up to the PC.

    It seems overwhelming at first and I still am learning what this thing can do.
    I am excited by the complexity and versitility of the GNX4.
    In my opinion regular guitar amps do not give a good sound with the GNX4. When I realized this my sound became excellent and I was sold on the GNX4.
    It is also the best songwriting tool ever. If I have an idea I just step on a pedal and it is recorded.
  • Still learning the capabilities of the GNX4 and I know the manual fairly well at this point. The only main aspect I have not explored in depth is the onboard 8 tr. Made a few test tracks, that's it, and the rest is done on Sonar when I have the time. I jam mostly with my own rythmn tracks, backing tracks or with the GNX4 drums. I use a vintage Pioneer amplifier and Yamaha NS-30T monitors. Cheap setup, cheap guitar, and a GNX4 is making the best consistant home studio experience of my life. I'm playing better than I ever have, and much of that is due to the 4's versatility, tweakability and ease of use after a period of exploration.

    The GNX4 is the best investment I've made in my music for many years. Lost a fine music collection to divorce, so I'm starting over. Now ready for a lifetime axe. No regrets and nothing but good to say about the 4's capabilities. Buying this unit restored my passion and it's worth every dime. Looking forward to at least a decade with the GNX4, might even hit the used market for a couple more for the kids in the future. A+ for GNX4, Digitech, and this forum. Read 'n tweak, bros.
  • Personally, the GNX4 is the best piece of musical equipment i have ever bought. The most value, the most beneficial to my skill and sound.
  • It's worth every dime you paid for it (not saying that I wouldn't like to see it go for less money...but...).

    I tend to go through a lot of changes over the years with my rig and/or setup, and hate to admit that I have ended up purchasing this bad boy 3 times now.

    I ended up selling it off twice for other setups (ie: Line6 Live, Boss Gt-6, etc) and I always seem to end back up with the GNX4.

    And as of right now, it couldn't be more perfect for me. I have been using it in more of a band setting for years, but am now planning on using it to do a number of one man band and \"coffee house\" gigs.

    And as mentioned before, it works great as a good general song writting tool as well.

    The GNX4 is pretty hard to beat.
Sign In or Register to comment.