To Wham or not to Wham?
This is a poll for you guys thoughts on whammy bars and bridges - your favorite set up etc.
I would like a floydy, with a tremsetter, as although the whammy in the gnx4 is good, it doesnt help when you are on stage 4 metres from it soloing....
I would like a floydy, with a tremsetter, as although the whammy in the gnx4 is good, it doesnt help when you are on stage 4 metres from it soloing....
Comments
God Bless!!
Partch
That said, I have no interest in using a whammy (even in my GNX4) and I have the trem body locked with a threaded stud going into the body with lock nuts on either side of the trem body. I don't do enough meth to be interested in whammy solos. Nor do I have the talent.
A well set up floyd rose is just MOIST!!
BUT... It's nice to have a hardtail too so.. I think we should all have several of both= GAS
Also, I have been told that a locking nut and tremelo system kills the natural sustain of the guitar. I was told that is because the locking nut and tremelo system lock the string between two points of steel on steel, whereas the stoptail piece and machine heads transfer the string vibrations through the entire wood body of the guitar. It makes sense to me, but I will defer to those on this forum with more tech expertise.
Yeah!!! Whammy Whammy Whammy. I use mine at least 6 times in a song where I don't \"use\" a whammy. When I get into it, I use it all the way through. I love that sounds and all you can do with it.
I have mostly Wilkeys. Nothing fancy. I have modified 6 hole Fender stock units so they stay in tune, two hole Fenders work good to when set up properly. No locking heads, no lockinhg nutt, nothing but a properly cut nutt, preferably a graphite nutt} on the neck so the strings don't bind, cheap ass goto tuners on all of them, and ROLLER \"T's\" on all of them.
I hate locking anythings. Just a con game as far as I'm concerned. And I am rough on my whammys.
The same here. Whenever I grab a Tele, I'm grabbing for the phantom whammy within the first bar. I tried tuning a locking system once and it took me about 20 minutes. And since the strings hadn't stretched out, I tuned a bit after that. Looks like a good concept, never needed one.
I bought a Tele from Warmoth a few years back. Quilted Naple top, Swampash body. {Ultra light} , and even a tummy cut. 3 Pickups SSH. It was set for a Rose, I asked them if they could modify it for a Wilkenson. They sent it to me unmodified, so I sent it back. Then they found that the Floyd took too much meat out of the stud area. Most beautifull Quilt I had seen in years. So I had to just take a refund. Yeah Yeah... Get to the point...
I would have had a whammy, even on my Tele if it would have worked out.
Hard as h@ll to mount one on a flat top. Bummers. Had them on all my Gibson Solids, and on my big Arch tops { \"F\" Holes}. I'd almost not even want to jam with a guitar without one. They just add way too much to be without if you learn how to use one.
For years, I only played my Charvel with a Floyd. Nothing else mattered. Then I realized that it was a total pain to play anything that was in an alternate tuning. Depending on the song, I either use a fixed bridge or a Floyd.
I agree with you completely. I installed a tremsetter a little while ago, and gave it a week. I removed it, because I like the feel without it much better. I felt a slight bump with the tremsetter. Since the Floyd is double locking, it's really not necessary.
Is the Barreta the Kramer with the Drop D pin on the Floyd? I was looking at that model for a long time, but didn't know anyone that played Kramers any longer.
I had a Kramer in the past, and sold it so I could get my Charvel.