GNX4 vs. GNX3000
I'm not sure which i want to go with,... i know the extras that the 3k has as well as the cool things that the 4 has thinkin bout getting both to solve my problem.... what do you think i should do..... I'm into doing recording but not sure i need the 8 track since the 3k can record via usb.... and i'm thinkin bout getting the weapon pedal as well since it sounds soo cool 
please any help would be appreciated

please any help would be appreciated
Comments
I wouldnt bother with the weapon.
http://www.gnx4.org/archive/comparing-gnx-units/
Get the GNX4. Forget the Weapon pedal. There are 3 patches G3456 put together for that pedal on the old sound community. Here are the links:
http://www.digitech.com/soundcomm/guitar_view_patch.asp?productid=199&patch_id=8863
http://www.digitech.com/soundcomm/guitar_view_patch.asp?productid=199&patch_id=8868
http://www.digitech.com/soundcomm/guitar_view_patch.asp?productid=199&patch_id=8873
God Bless!!!
Partch
Excellent comparison table Ilia!! Wish I had seen this before I bought, but I still think I made the right choice (for me) going with the 3k. I'm happier with it, than I've ever been playing guitar through a modeler.
You're absolutlely right about the mixed opinions, which is why I was careful to word my response in a way that didn't say one is \"better\" than the other. Each one has certain features that the others don't, and I agree that it is REALLY tough deciding which are more important - I want them ALL!!!!!!!
I think I've used that line way too many times...
My motto...cheap booze...cheaper women...expensive toy's.
Why complicate things?
TY
shando
The tones seem fuller and less digital. If you listen to the 3000 samples that people post, you'll notice that the samples are usually dry. That's because you don't need reverb or delay to smooth out some of the distortions.
When I first got the 3000, I wasn't too sure if it sounded any better. It took very little dialing in to get some great tones from the stock patches. I can hear a huge difference now and want to re-record a lot of my old songs now. There also seems to be a better distortion breakup reaction in relation to dynamics, so it rewards you with cleaner notes when playing lightly and more breakup when picking harder. More of a tube-like response.
I really liked a lot of the tones that I got out of my GNX4 and it's got more features, but for recording, the 3000 wins in my opinion.
Sorry man, but I know I'm not the only one with this testimony.
Shando, don't waste that money keep the GNX4 unless you go for total tube preamps.
This is for the people who don't own a GNX, than they might think over to buy which 1 they like.
The GNX3000 that I own was not for replacing my current setup. I'm using the Tube Preamp ADA MP1 for my Dirty and clean sound. I was curious and wanted to try out this multi effects peddle and actually I got kind of tired carrying around my heavy Rack Setup, once in a while. So I go around testing, listening and read up the specs/effects on any multi effects peddle that I can get.
So at last I've decided on the GNX3000 because the distortion and the effects it produce are around my taste, not as good/warm as a real TUBE distortion but its there.
Red barchetta to 2112, or Brain Damage.. bang- in there! In these songs the efx settings are all over the place. patch changing does not allow the clean transitions. So, you use control assigns. having any of three kinds of variable effects transitions on one patch is vital for our band. Orig's or covers. What used to take a huge rack system and multi configured midi pedal is now as easy on the GNX4. 3 params, min/max settings can be arranged any way you wish in one preset. But the GNX4 gives you 3 of these control assign switches.. that makes 9 sets of efx/amp changes in one patch.. now add the expression assigns.. you have 12 sets of param changes, via 3 amp channels.. sound like a midi pedal rig???
To test all this, I set up both units and asked the sound guys and audio guys what appealed to them more.. for them GNX4 was the winner. From their opinion. With Xlr's through the House PA and 1/4\" via my Mesa 50/50 amp w 4x12 stereo (swamp thangs/mod 12's0. 2 additional mics off axis feeding the console. that mix is killer! Xlr feeds are usually lower. Depends on Indoor or Outdoor venue.
Cleans have the low end w top end clarity. more than the 3K? To them maybe... again debatable
Drives were subtle with gain change.. not as abrubt as the 3K (no gates on, no compression )
Effects- this is what they liked best. Exact same effects settings the 4 had less inherent artifacts as did the 3K. many say it's because the processor of the 4 is more powerful. It is more capable since it handles many of the additional features the GNX4 contains.
latency is also much less of an issue on the 4. Again, processor requirements not as taxing on the 4.
All this is debatable- but here's #1 what stands out for my live/recording usage if I haven't said it already 8x:
CONTROL ASSIGNS. I miss not having control assigns on the 3K. When you cover or do complex originals, control assigns give you tons more flexibility than the 3K. If you don't use C.A., then it won't be a big deal either way.
#2 GNX4 LFO has less pingy fluctuations with sin/square slopes at .4-.6sec . if you don't use it.. no big deal. To most people it's not very noticable. If you play with a variety of complex settings it will be by far.
many ask me why I play the 4 so much, Short answer-Control Assigns mainly since I require so much of the flexibillity it offers. Sounds? I can get them out of either one. Stock models of the 3K are better.. hands down. many users find the difference harder to accommodate an amp? So to them it may sound thin?.. again.. it's all debatable! Now many know why I prefer the GNX4 in usage. Both are great units! For my purposes, I need the features the 4 offers. That's why 99% of pics have that unit near my feet!
I could go on... bottom line, GNX4 is much more flexible and has many more practical functions and features. GNX3000... better amp tones. I really hated the GNX3000 because of the lack of controllers, until I heard it! After that I said, maybe it's not so bad after all. I do miss the features, but 3k is my main amp/multi-fx now.
As far as switching time... the amp model data is much more detailed on GNX3000, and thus there is more to \"load\" each time you call up the next patch. There is also an additional AudioDNA-1 processor (GNX4 has 3 of them, GNX3000 has 4) that handles some of the CBM calculations (I'm guessing)... so there are all these additional issues. This is probably what accounts for the latency in switching patches, besides actual processor speed.
For me, I just use the unit at home and it's attached to my desktop which is set up to record and has drum synths loaded. I have no need for the extras that the 4 offers so that's a consideration that future purchasers have to think about.
I'm glad that you guys have all these good points because I've got to E-Bay my 4.
Still I'm a tone guy so, I don't need much controller assign. So anyone here who wants to choose which GNX, than they have to know what they want and you can't have best of both worlds and it boils down to cost.
If cost is no object than I would want a GNX with the flexibility of a GNX4 with 2 expression paddle and tone of a tube preamp and that will be the most perfect Multi effects paddle in the world.
Are you kidding? You know how hard it is to search there, right?