What do you/would you rather record on (computer)

shredd · January 2008

I'm curious as to what the pros and cons of various recording software is. I've had no success with PTP, so I'm curious what everyone else is using, why, and what they do and don't like about it. I'm also curious what version you're using/want. Chime in...

partch · January 2008

Sonar 5 Producer. 8)

pieces · January 2008

I started with Sonar LE but it crashed many times in the middle of a project so I switched to Live 6. I've been really happy with it. The interface and the arrangement view is addictive once you start using. I also have Pro Tools LE but it requires a lot of resources.

SlashNBurn99 · January 2008

I just switched to Reaper. 8)

phatsack · January 2008

I used to own an Mbox with Pro-Tools LE. But I got rid of it and now I use my GNX3K and ProTracks Plus.

Pro Tools is much easier to get the hang of, but for what I do (record everything separately based on the guitar) , the GNX3K and PTP is more practical.

stratfish60 · January 2008

I use PTP. Some time's it work's some time's it dosn't :?

I hate VISTA

Mickster · January 2008

I selected Sonar but I also use Reaper.

Cheers!

Mickster

swallace1 · January 2008

I was using Soar 4 producers edition till I bought the gnx3k now I have been using ptp

Mickster · January 2008

\stratfish60\ wrote:

I use PTP. Some time's it work's some time's it dosn't :?
I hate VISTA

I recommend that you download the Reaper demo and see what you think. It's soooo easy to get up and running with.

Cheers!

Mickster

gtaus · January 2008

I have been real happy with the GNX4 and PTP. That is my main recording setup. I also have Sonar 5 Producer but have not had time to learn much about it. We got it to perform a few functions that PTP will not do with previously recorded music (audiosnap). Of course, Sonar 5 Producer is in a higher class, but PTP does everything I need to do. Take care.

thehootman · January 2008

Adobe Audition. Much more compatible with hardware, and has a far better user interface than anything else I have come across.

CESprague · January 2008

<div style="displaynone">fiogf49gjkf0d</div><div style="displaynone">fiogf49gjkf0d</div>Sonar 7 Producer

GNX Jammer · January 2008

I voted \"other\".

Acid Pro 6 (for track sequencing)
Sound Forge 8 (to create custom loops)

shredd · January 2008

Lotsa guys voting \"Sonar\"...

In addition to your votes, I'm curious why you all prefer any program over other, particularly ease of use, quality/simplicity of interface, compatibility and demands on your hardware, yada...

thehootman · January 2008

I really cant go past Audition. Its really simple in terms of its interface, yet allows you massive control. Also it is flexible with hardware, and doesnt waste any of my time with this rubbish MIDI business!

Thats the only downfall - it cant record or edit MIDI

ednrg · January 2008

\shredd\ wrote:

Lotsa guys voting \"Sonar\"...

In addition to your votes, I'm curious why you all prefer any program over other, particularly ease of use, quality/simplicity of interface, compatibility and demands on your hardware, yada...

I've tried a few different programs a couple of years ago. I have several friends that use different programs, which makes it difficult at times for collaborative efforts. The upside is that I can see the differences between the programs worked by people that have a good understanding of the programs.

In reality, most of them do exactly the same things. The means of getting there is somewhat different. I chose Sonar because it seemed that they were ahead of the curve in features that I like to use.

There was a time when I really tried to use Cubase because Sonar didn't have native VST support (which has since been implemented). I was frustrated by the roundabout way it took to complete the task. The same task could be done in a simple hotkey in Sonar. There was probably some way to bind the entire operation into a more manageable way. But stumbling around brought me to such frustration where my productivity was at an all-time low.

On the other side of the coin, when my friends come over and take the helm, they stumble around Sonar. I'm staying with Sonar, not out of necessity, but because the new Sonar features in every version seem to be the features that I am interested in the most.

Here is a short \"shootout\" that match up 5 of the most popular Digital Audio Workstation software products:
http://digitalmusicdoctor.com/shootout/shootout_summary.htm

iliace · January 2008

I use Sonar 5. I started out on PC with Sonar 4 and upgraded later on. I have gotten quite comfortable with it, so I see no reason to switch. It does everything I need it to. I also love the Sonitus effects suite.

For mastering, I also use Adobe Audition 2.0 - that program rocks! I've never used it for multi-track stuff however.

0Dannyboy · January 2008

I use an MBOX with Pro Tools 7.3.
Hope to upgrade to the digital mixing board interface one day and run Protools HD.

Unknown · January 2008

I used to use Sonar on My PC but as time when along I wanted more automation and MIDI features that Sonar would terribly glitch.
I switched over to Cubase SX3 a while ago and for me and my PC the program has been flawless. (They are having tons of trouble with Cubase 4 so I wont switch)
I'm sticking with what I got because it works for me.
I guess it's all a matter of feature preference and what your use to.
If I had a Mac I would definatly go with Pro Tools.
It takes a while to learn a program inside and out. I'll stick with what I know for now, though the future always changes and sometimes your forced to move on to new technology-Picking whoever's the best at the time.
Who will it be when I get my next computer?
Lots of research will tell.

Rawb · March 2008

I was just wondering what the benefits of moving on to sonar 6 HS XL are ( as suggested ) compared to ptp? As mentioned in other post, ptp gets the job done. So does an old Hagstrom and a piggyback. But how much more enjoyable it is to play thru a marshall 1/2 stack, via vintage 61 strat with the added inspiration of a gnx4

. Would it be that much better? Though there is something to be said about old Hags, but that is for another thread.

And I also just wanted to bump this thread up. To see if it gets any fresh votes.

guitar3456 · March 2008

Sonar 6 HS XL is CHEAP for what it does..and what comes with it. You can spend days on Dimension LE. It comes with Session Drummer and a host of great plugins. It is far superior in simplicity.. not as tasking as Sonar Producer editions. The interface is not as broad or resource demanding. Nonetheless, you still must set up your pc for audio recording if you want a very stable and less cpu intensive usage. Is it as flexible as Sonar 7 Producer or even Sonar 5 PE?? hardly... it fits a realm of user as an entry but very capable for the entry player to find a pro session.

Sonar Prod and other versions have many more VST plugins for effects, and some goodies most would never use with intro level knowledge. As an intro program I'd never suggest Producer edition unless you have a lot of time.

Comparing to Pro Tracks ( free bundle) ?? You can't compare them. SONAR 6HSXL is 6 years ahead of Sonar 2 (ptp version). That's like comparing a PIII to a Core 2 duo.

OTOH, the newer programs would require a much more improved system to run things.

What do you/would you rather record on (computer)

Comments