NXV-300 or TPControl
dspot
Junior Member
So, which would you use or recommend, the virtual touch panel, accesible from all devices or TPControl which we must choose according to the device we use? I think AMX would like us to purchase their product, with good reasons behind it too.
Comments
-
We had to make allowances for the slowness of the NXV300, reducing our extensive color themeing and slowing the commands to it via a queue, much like the R4. It's internal web server can be overwhelmed with a lot of panel instruction. The web server in it isn't iPhone browser compatible, so you CAN'T use it without a VNC client on a iPad or iPhone. And VNC is slower, especially remotely. If you have iThings in the mix, you may as well buy a 430 panel at the same cost as the 300, and use it for real as a panel in the system and the iThings as extensions of that panel via VNC. You get another panel out of the deal.
If the iPad is the device desired, the performance of TPCONTROL is worth the cost. Many say it's a better, sharper, faster panel experience than an 8400.
I think you need to choose for the individual job. You can't just pick one. -
Agree on the 430 touchpanel
Categories
- All Categories
- 2.5K AMX General Discussion
- 922 AMX Technical Discussion
- 514 AMX Hardware
- 502 AMX Control Products
- 3 AMX Video Distribution Products
- 9 AMX Networked AV (SVSI) Products
- AMX Workspace & Collaboration Products
- 3.4K AMX Software
- 151 AMX Resource Management Suite Software
- 386 AMX Design Tools
- 2.4K NetLinx Studio
- 135 Duet/Cafe Duet
- 248 NetLinx Modules & Duet Modules
- 57 AMX RPM Forum
- 228 MODPEDIA - The Public Repository of Modules for Everyone
- 943 AMX Specialty Forums
- 2.6K AMXForums Archive
- 2.6K AMXForums Archive Threads
- 1.5K AMX Hardware
- 432 AMX Applications and Solutions
- 249 Residential Forum
- 182 Tips and Tricks
- 146 AMX Website/Forums